4k 144hz reddit. Just looking for opinions really.

4k 144hz reddit. I didn’t really care too much about using monitor 60hz because I was on a budget then. I switch back and forth depending on the game. I've been shopping around and I'm trying to stay in the $600-$900 range and have found a few models, but I'm not sure about the quality vs reliability of some of them. I’d like 4K and I’d like 32” still, don’t need curved but don’t care either. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Best budget 4k 144hz monitor . 4k 144hz was a dream of mine ever since I sidegraded from a 4k 60hz monitor to a 1440p 144hz monitor in 2018. HDMI 1. I have a 24 inch 1440p 165 Hz TN Gsync monitor (Dell S2417DG) and a 27 inch 4K 60 Hz IPS non-Gsync monitor from LG (forgot the model name) I prefer to use my 1440p for gaming, and 4K for media consumption (Netflix, YouTube, etc. It basically allows you to play from 60hz-144hz(or even lower or higher) with low latency AND low overshoot, which is not something common on monitors. People recommending ultrawide aren't taking price into account, ultrawides are way more Kogan claims to use Samsung and or LG panels for their TV's - they don't make any 4K 144hz QD panels. Max Refresh Rate 165 Hz. HDMI, Display port, and throughput. What is the cheapest (while still » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. 4k apex looks beautiful. For better 4k gaming, see GIGABYTE M27U or LG 27GN950-B 4K 120 Hz 10 bpc with CVT-R2 timing uses 32. However, some monitors cheap out and only have an hdmi 2. Right now, about 99% of my gaming is Warzone. This is kinda why I wasn't really too worried about the fact there's really no 4K 144hz monitors out there with HDMI 2. Selecting the perfect 4K 144Hz gaming monitor is more than just a matter of specifications; it's about delivering an unparalleled gaming experience. It's pretty much the best 4k 144hz panel if you don't care about HDR or OLED Oct 31, 2024 В· Although entry-level 4k gaming monitors tend to cost more than other simple 4k monitors, like those meant for office use, they're getting cheaper and are worth getting for gaming. So in SDR HDMI 2. Native Resolution 3840 x 2160. 4k 144hz even tho you’re capped at 120hz, 4k is absolutely mind blowing sharp. I'm having some trouble mantaining a solid 60fps at 4k, maxed out settings in quite a few games, which is somewhat expected, but nevertheless a bit disappointing. Amazing contrast and good local dimming. I made the change from 1080p 240hz to 4K 144hz and 1440p 144hz. This leaves me with very few and very expensive options for the monitor, which I am kinda ok paying especially since I want to have only one monitor. The difference from 1440p to 4k is quite big. I'm going by PS4 Pro output here. If I try to lower it to 120hz or 100hz, it shows the HDMI disconnected screen. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49 in 4K » ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q1A – 4k, 60hz, freesync, good entry level 4k gaming monitor. + 4k from PS4 Pro looked NICE too. The jump from 1440p to 4K is more noticeable than the jump from 144Hz to 240Hz in my honest opinion, definitely would say go with a 4K 144Hz in this situation. I had previously been fixated on the Dell G3223Q, but it and the Gigabyte M32U have limited bandwidth of 24 Gbps or so, insufficient for 4K 144hz uncompressed. I have a 4080, 13700k and currently using a 240hz 1080p nonitor just for reference. People who had the Samsung 1440p 240hz with 10bpc that had same problem too. It's a high-end monitor with both good picture quality and gaming performance. 1440p doesn't sale into 4k without doing fractions, which creates blurring. If that's what you're interested in, the Gigabyte M27U is a good choice, but there are a few trade-offs versus the Acer Nitro XV275K P3biipruzx . Meanwhile, in games, your GPU will be expending effort rendering detail you won't even be able to reliably discern. I will be using it on a variety of games in the future, not just FPS games. 1 is the go to choice if the Monitor supports the full bandwidth. Asus ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP. I can tell you now that I would pick the LG CX 48 over my 240 hz every time. 4 + DSC -> HDMI 2. 1 and only support half bandwidth so it is 24gb instead of 48. I have been thinking 4k 144hz But if there is a alternate option please suggest it. When the 3090 was revealed and benchmarks came out I realized that 4k 144hz Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » MSI OPTIX 341CQR - VA, great budget option for a gaming ultrawide. Even for non-gaming stuff, the 4K monitor will just look great and you could probably get close to that 144 FPS range in Fortnite with a 3080 Ti if you turn some settings down (for Methodology: Curating the Best 4K 144Hz Gaming Monitors Based on Personal Experience and Research. Size 32". looking to expand that soon. My advice is not to sweat differences between 144hz, 165hz etc. Jul 24, 2024 В· Build Help 4080 super and 4K 240hz monitor or 4090 and 1080p monitor 144hz? (self. 4 also doesn't have enough bandwidth for 4K 144hz 10 bit color uncompressed. 1 supports 4K@120fps maximum (or 8K@60 . This Aug 4, 2024 В· LG 27GP950 / 27GP95R – A 27″ 4K 144Hz monitor with a 98% DCI-P3 color gamut and hardware calibration support. But then it wouldn't make any sense to limit it to 144 Hz at 4K. 4 are easily capable of 144hz at 4k with DSC. 4 4k 120hz 10bit no dsc = dp1. I have used both, a big TV 4K 60hz and currently using a 1440P 144hz 27" display and in most cases the 1440p is a better experience. 1 uses. 1. Another point I personally like to state in my own opinion. Gsync and freesync will also work on both connections. So the experience should be pretty good for you. Refresh rate makes it great for esports. I’m just torn on what to buy & what I want. Display Port 1. There are a few niche cases where the 4K big screen shines though, like third person single player games. If a 4k 120Hz display has a VRR (freesync or gsync) then definitely it is worth it. Admittedly, 240hz isn't the biggest difference over 144hz, but it's still a little noticable, add the lower input and render latency and you get a decent bit advantage over 4k 144hz. I am searching for a good gaming 4k monitor, HDR1000 with local dimming (X27 had 384 zones), 144Hz+ with adaptive sync. I have a 4K 60 Hz screen and well optimized games like God of War and Horizon Zero Dawn can run consistently at 4k and even hit a regular 48-60 fps with settings maxed out. Or the big brother M32U if you want a larger screen. I have a ViewSonic 240 hz monitor and the LG CX 48 120Hz. See all our test results. C1 isn't going to do it and they said the new oled monitor they are making is only going to be 60 hz and aimed at content creators. 9. You're right that it is hard to find accessories because usb 3 is a nightmare with all the random numbers and facts to obfuscate what really matters. 1 can also use DSC by the way. Both are relatively cheap (compared to peers) and offer pretty much everything you could want. 1440p is 2560 x 1440, and 4k is 3840 x 2160. Low input lag. 4 So obviously hdmi2. Both will use dsc for 4k 144hz and work just fine tho. 27 Gbit/s data rate. 1 yet cause good luck finding a game that's gonna run well enough to utilize hdmi 2. Im in a similar situation as OP. Oct 16, 2024 В· 4. You can notice 4k, but not that much. But i didnt think about the gsync compatibility, so you are saying i cant make it work with hdmi2. I'm mostly using this monitor for work, but the upgrade is for gaming and media purposes. 24in 1080p 144hz - » LG 24GN650-B - IPS, fast response time, 144hz, HDR10. I have the 7800x3d paired with the 7800xt. Going from 27" 1440p to 32" 4k is only a ppi increase of about 27% due to the difference in screen size and the Alienware has 175hz instead of 144hz as a trade-off, which is probably more important for competitive fps anyway. Todays trend is that newly released (and thus graphically demanding) games are more and more supporting some sort of optimization like DLSS, FSR or even dumb auto render resolution features. HDR and VRR seem to work fine. technically on paper you even go higher than that but). If it can output to 4K @ 60 Hz, then it can handle 1440p @ 144Hz. 32", 4k, 144hz, IPS, supports VRR. As for recommendations, probably go with the LG 32GR93U. As someone who owned a 1440p 144hz monitor and a 4k 144hz now, for editing/grading video and photo buy the one that has the better color space and panel. » Gigabyte M32U - This is the current king of performance and value. For better 4k gaming, see GIGABYTE M27U or LG 27GN950-B On average 4000 Hz will send inputs with 0. Just looking for opinions really. The 4080 is in a weird spot, faster than a 3090 (a 4k@60 card IMO) but nowhere near as fast as a 4090 (a 4k@120+ card if you ask me, still need to tweak at times for 144). Noticed there are a lot of posts looking for 4k monitors. 1 port that does half of the bandwidth, which does require DSC for 144hz (120hz too). For better 4k gaming, see GIGABYTE M27U or LG 27GN950-B I just recently upgraded my computer and I've been wanting to upgrade from the 24" FHD 144hz panel i have to a 32" 4k 144hz. But I've had a couple of their 43" Dolby Vision VRR panels in the past and they did what they said on the tin. buildapc) submitted 3 months ago by [deleted] Pretty much you can buy a 4080 super now and get a nice monitor or you own a 1080p and buy a 4090. 4k 144 no matter what. HDMI 2. DSC is visually lossless or at least I have never been able to tell any difference to running without it at 4k 60 Hz. 1440p high/ultra settings actually looks pretty fucking similar to 4k medium settings to my eyes As the title says, what would be the best 4K, 144Hz monitor I could get right now? I'm assuming my PC can handle it. 1 Gbit/s (and around 44 Gbit/s for 144 Hz) which is what HDMI 2. Don't need high end HDR or super high brightness, just need to be able to play HDR video. Keep in mind, finding a good quality 4K 144hz HDR600 or 1000 monitor is hard plus it’s expensive. 4 supports 4K120, it sits between HDMI 2. But I am also a gamer and I want to move to >144hz and the usual gaming tech specs (input lag, grey-to-grey etc). My 3080 can max out the 180hz in most games, but 4k plus high fps makes you think you are seeing a game for the first time again. M28u, m32u, g322, msi 321xxxx, 27gn50 (Names might be a little off but yeah) etc. X27 had amazing HDR that edges out most modern monitors except for top of the line ones, so HDR matters a lot to me, and it is a criteria for purchase. I refuse to buy another Asus monitor knowing there’s way better competitors in the market rn. For better 4k gaming, see GIGABYTE M27U or LG 27GN950-B All I need is a 27–28" 4K 144 Hz (or 120 Hz) IPS monitor that supports G-Sync and HDR (don’t mind if it’s fake HDR as long as highlights stand out and aren’t crushed, the PG279QM is totally fine in this regard). You will not see the mouse movements become visibly more smooth/refined with 4000 Hz compared to 1000 Hz unless you are moving the mouse fast enough to create more than 1000 counts of motion per second. If it's good at 144hz(low latency, low overshoot), it'll generally have tons of overshoot at 60hz in most cases. A 27-inch 4K monitor with a 144Hz refresh rate. For gaming, if there's a significant price differential get 1440p. The KVM switch especially is great for productiviity to share with a MacBook or work PC. I use the Club3D DP 1. + 1 cable simplicity for 4k 120hz, no dual cable BS unless you want 144hz. Would also love to upgrade hz rate if I’m going to spend the money and call it an upgrade might as fuggin well I 4k 144hz 10bit no dsc = hdmi2. 1 4k 144hz 10bit dsc = dp1. As the video suggests, the M28U is the best general purpose 4K 144Hz monitor. 1 and DP 1. 240 hz is a bigger deal but even then, make sure you have the hardware to take advantage of that. You can test this now by running 1080p on your 1440p monitor. A) 4k monitor, 144hz B) 1440p monitor, 240hz Mostly will use this for gaming and a lil bit of media consumption. Some games you'll need to turn down settings if you want a good framerate at 4k, but I've yet to find one that overwhelmed the card at 1440p Seeing as 144hz at 4K is pretty tough, going 120 is probably fine. 4k/120 is just the current limitation of HDMI 2. Right now, I'm using a 27-inch 2560x1440 monitor at 144Hz, and I love how responsive it is, especially when working with multiple windows. To be fair at the beginning it didn’t felt as smooth as i was used to, but after a couple of days, 144hz became the standard and it was plenty enough. 1 vrr? So its better to just go for 4k 120hz 10bit no dsc + gsync instead I'm looking to replace my 32-inch 4K 60hz SDR monitor (LG 32UD59) with one that is 144hz and supports HDR. On these specific monitors (m28u,m32u fi32u) it's a fake hdmi 2. This is someone who is upgrading from 1080p 60hz and a prebuilt pc. Both come out to about the same price right now. Yes, HDMI 2. Best bang for the buck here. I'm having an issue with my 3080 and Samsung QN95b where it gets stuck at 4K@144hz when I enable Gaming Mode. That said, with how the current market is for 4k 144hz, I would personally wait for more options, most current 4k 144hz screens are very expensive while still rocking globally lit IPS panels and their shit contrast ratios+IPS glow while being sold at very high price points. 1 on that hardware. So, if you're aiming for 4k 60fps and don't want to wait for the next gen of gpus to come by, IMHO, a 3080ti is a bit more suitable for very demanding games. And even downgrading in hz I didn’t notice much. You won't get 4k 144hz in most games, but having 4k 144hz give you the flexibility to prioritize frames or resolution depending on the game. I run a 27" 4k 144hz lg and a 32" 180hz ultrawide 1440p Acer. + I think HDR, even though it's crappy pseudo HDR, made the image look a bit better and richer. IMHO at normal viewing distances, the resolution of 4K at 27" is so high that you'll end up using scaling for desktop use. My primary reasoning for not wanting 32” is desk space, and from what ive read online the pixel density for 4k at 27” is noticeably better than at 32”. Best bang for the buck right now, unless the AOC 24G2 is in stock 1440p 144hz » Acer Nitro for budget, LG27GP850-B or Dell G2724D for mid range - IPS, 165hz, Reddit favorite monitors. I’ll be using it for work and gaming, so hopefully 8-10 hours a day won’t kill the screen, and I just hope it’s not too big. 1 Spec. Contrast is ok. Preferably has no G-Sync model with fan. The difference from 144hz to 240 is extremely small. LG 27GR93U – a newer version of the 27GP950, though it’s just as expensive yet it has worse specs: DisplayHDR 400 and 95% DCI-P3. So with some GPU power, 4k 60+Hz is not a impossible task. For 144hz, see Gigabyte 4K or LG 27GN950-B Without local dimming HDR is almost useless and even with local dimming you need plenty of dimming zones, ideally 384 or more, but that would cost a lot. DisplayPort doesn't help because version 1. But the OLED picture quality is gonna have to blow me away to consider keeping that over the cheaper gigabyte I ordered. There is some benefit regardless of DPI. 1080p does fit into 4k without fractions if you do integer scaling. 1 is more than just cables, it does also include stuff for monitors, which is where you see stuff like 4k/120 capabilities via HDMI and VRR support. Personally, specially if you are going above 24 inch I would choose 4k/144hz or 1440p/144hz, if I'm not wrong the 3080ti should play the latest games at 4k/60 ultra settings at least with dlss when needed, so going enough above 60fps shouldn't be an issue with medium/high settings, you can always use dlss performance too. 4 will be 32gb bandwidth so use this one. To put it shortly, would anyone be able to recommend in their opinion the best 4k 144hz monitor, preferably IPS panel, for £500? I know that you get what you pay for, and it's difficult to find something good at this price. I came from using a 1440p ultrawide. Question Basically the title. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 240hz and 49in or Alienwaire AW3423DWF for OLED, 175hz 4K For a good list compiled by a redditor, see here for considerations and recommendations » BenQ EX2710U – 4k, 144hz, poor HDR. 1 adapter to be able to use 4K 120 Hz 10-bit on my LG CX 48" OLED with my 2080 Ti which doesn't have a HDMI 2. We likely need to wait for HDMI 2. » Samsung Neo G8 - 32", 240hz, HDMI 2. And for HDR 120hz is perfectly fine. With 8b/10b encoding this requires 40. Been considering going up to 4k, currently have a 27” 1440p monitor. On "performance mode" Spider Man Miles Morales can do upscaled 4K and ray tracing turned off at 60 FPS but not true 4K. » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. 5900x and a rtx 3080 with the LG 27GN950-B. 1 port. VA & slightly curved. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49in or Alienwaire AW3423DWF for OLED, 175hz 4K For a good list compiled by a redditor, see here for considerations and recommendations » BenQ EX2710U – 4k, 144hz, poor HDR. And anyway, there's exactly one 4K 240 Hz monitor at the moment, the Neo G8, and between scanlines and whatnot, I'm not sure if it's a good purchase. Or A 27-inch 5K monitor at 60Hz. . This means you really need a 4K 240 Hz panel to achieve what you want. If you don't notice any blurring, you probably wouldn't notice 1440p blurring on 4k either. It was on all the 4k 144hz that use DSC. You can always play at 1440p or even 1080p on the 4k screen if the games are too hard to run. Pixel Type VA. 375 milliseconds less delay than 1000 Hz. 3 Gbit/s transmission bandwidth. I'm not a gamer, but I do a lot of work that involves moving windows around and scrolling through text. + it's amazing having the crispness of 4k and the speed of 120/144hz, incredibly immersive. 2 for them to increase bandwidth again to allow refresh rates higher than 120hz@4k resolution. ) Hardware Unboxed has CS2 in some benchmark videos and it looks like at 4k with medium settings, the 7900xtx gets 300 fps. 4 supports 4K@30fps maximum HDMI 2. I have been looking for a high end monitor to replace my current one. 2 would require to transmit this. 1 can carry 4k 144hz 10-bit signals without DSC. 0 supports 4K@60fps maximum HDMI 2. Best Premium 4K Gaming Monitor The Asus ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP is another dual-mode gaming monitor on our list, although this one is decidedly more premium. Just a beast of a monitor. It’s more expensive, but can be found on sale for $500 – $700. The best 4k 144Hz monitor we've tested is the Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 S32BG75. And most wont be able to pass a blind AB comparison at standard viewinf distances. Native G-Sync would be welcome, but apparently its extremely rare in such monitors. Which would you do? Sep 16, 2024 В· 7. 0 or DP 1. However with 16b/18b encoding it only takes 36. 1 in terms of bandwidth. But 2. So you're left with a 4k@80-100 sort of middle ground under that 120fps sweet spot, but still better than 60fps. My specs Icore9 Geforce 3090 8TB SSD Maximus XIII Extreme MotherBoard 1000 Watt Power Chord NZXT Kraken Cooler 32GB Memory 4k is worth it over 1440p imo. Maybe I am not exactly right in everything I said, but that's how I understand it. The increase in smoothness was worth it to me since I play a lot of competitive FPS games, but there's no denying that 4k looks about twice as good as 1440p. 0 and 2. Anyways, I have found a few depending on what you need from the adapter. That's what newer 144hz 4k monitors do. the dp 1. This is the bandwidth that interfaces like HDMI 2. Don't expect any 4k OLEDs to do more than 120 hz in the next 5 years, at least. 4090 $1700 4080 super $1000 + Monitor $6-700. nkf bnj fiapj cbnefe ikumm swadc wxcv gvjus urvov tjgo